Why Buddhism is True

A Note to Readers

The introductory note of the book, 'Why Buddhism Is True,' clarifies the focus on naturalistic aspects of Buddhism, emphasizing universal core ideas while avoiding overly detailed doctrines. It aims to challenge and possibly transform readers' understanding of themselves and the world, highlighting the nuanced view of 'truth' in Buddhist teachings and the compatibility of Buddhist insights with other belief systems.

Core Themes


1. Taking the Red Pill

This chapter draws a parallel between the transformative choice depicted in 'The Matrix' and the adoption of Buddhism, emphasizing how meditation and Buddhist philosophy help unveil the illusionary nature of reality crafted by natural selection. It explains how natural selection leads to transient pleasures and perpetual dissatisfaction, suggesting that true happiness involves becoming aware of and confronting these delusions, a process facilitated by mindfulness and Buddhist practices.

The Matrix Analogy

Natural Selection and Delusion

Kind of cruel, in a way— but what do you expect from natural selection? Its job is to build machines that spread genes, and if that means programming some measure of illusion into the machines, then illusion there will be.

Buddhism and the Alleviation of Delusion

“Ultimately, happiness comes down to choosing between the discomfort of becoming aware of your mental afflictions and the discomfort of being ruled by them.”

All Highlights

Kind of cruel, in a way— but what do you expect from natural selection? Its job is to build machines that spread genes, and if that means programming some measure of illusion into the machines, then illusion there will be.
“Ultimately, happiness comes down to choosing between the discomfort of becoming aware of your mental afflictions and the discomfort of being ruled by them.”

2. Paradoxes of Meditation

The chapter delves into the paradoxes inherent in meditation, the challenges faced by the author due to personal traits, and the potential of meditation to address modern issues like tribalism. Through experiences from a meditation retreat, it explores key Buddhist concepts such as not-self and emptiness, and ponders whether negative feelings might be illusions that meditation can dispel, ultimately connecting personal enlightenment with social progress.

Paradoxes in Meditation

Challenges in Meditation

Tribalism and Modern Society

The Meditative Retreat Experience

Buddhist Philosophy and its Real-World Implications


3. When Are Feelings Illusions?

The chapter explores the nature of feelings from both Buddhist philosophical and evolutionary perspectives. It discusses how feelings can often be illusions, particularly when they're mismatched to our modern environment. Through mindfulness meditation and cognitive-behavioral therapy, one can learn to scrutinize and manage these feelings, reducing their impact on one's well-being.

Buddhism's Perspective on Feelings

Evolutionary Insights on Feelings

False Feelings Due to Evolutionary Mismatch

Natural Illusions and False Positives

Mindfulness and Cognitive Therapy


4. Bliss, Ecstasy, and More Important Reasons to Meditate

The chapter explores the concepts of mind wandering, the default mode network, and the benefits of both concentration and mindfulness meditation. It emphasizes the significance of mindfulness in everyday life and outlines the ultimate goals of meditation, including insight and enlightenment.

Challenges in Meditation

Default Mode Network

Concentration and Mindfulness Meditation

Benefits of Mindfulness Meditation

Insight and Enlightenment


5. The Alleged Nonexistence of Your Self

The chapter explores the Buddhist concept of anatta (not-self), explaining that the self is an illusion composed of five aggregates that aren’t truly self. Through meditation, one can begin to experience detachment from these aggregates, reducing suffering. Despite language limitations and historical ambiguities, a central Buddhist theme is the flawed perception of the self, which is less controlled and more transient than perceived, a view that modern psychology may support.

Understanding Anatta (Not-Self)

The Seminal Not-Self Sermon

Does Not-Self Mean No Self?

A Heresy Examined

“Engagement” refers, rather, to a stronger connection between consciousness and the other aggregates. Engagement is the product of a “lust,” as the Buddha puts it, that people have for the aggregates; there is a clinging to them, a possessive relationship to them. In other words, the “engagement” persists so long as the person fails to realize that the aggregates are “not-self.” The person clings to emotions, thoughts, and other elements of the aggregates as if they were personal belongings. But they’re not.†
liberation consists of changing the relationship between your consciousness and the things you normally think of as its “contents”— your feelings, your thoughts, and so on. Once you realize that these things are “not-self,” the relationship of your consciousness to them becomes more like contemplation than engagement, and your consciousness is liberated. And the “you” that remains— the you that, in that first discourse on the not-self, the Buddha depicts as liberated— is this liberated consciousness. I

Practical Approach to Not-Self

Taking Charge by Letting Go

Final Thoughts

As we saw in chapter 2, feelings are designed by natural selection to represent judgments about things, evaluations of them; natural selection “wants” you to experience things as either good or bad. The Buddha believed that the less you judge things— including the contents of your mind— the more clearly you’ll see them, and the less deluded you’ll be.
Still, amid all the disagreement over what the Buddha said and what the Buddha meant, there are some themes that everyone agrees are part of the Buddhist tradition from early on. And one of these is that our conception of our selves is, at best, wildly off the mark. We associate the self with control and with firm persistence through time, but on close inspection we turn out to be much less under control, and much more fluid, with a much less fixed identity, than we think.

All Highlights

“Engagement” refers, rather, to a stronger connection between consciousness and the other aggregates. Engagement is the product of a “lust,” as the Buddha puts it, that people have for the aggregates; there is a clinging to them, a possessive relationship to them. In other words, the “engagement” persists so long as the person fails to realize that the aggregates are “not-self.” The person clings to emotions, thoughts, and other elements of the aggregates as if they were personal belongings. But they’re not.†
liberation consists of changing the relationship between your consciousness and the things you normally think of as its “contents”— your feelings, your thoughts, and so on. Once you realize that these things are “not-self,” the relationship of your consciousness to them becomes more like contemplation than engagement, and your consciousness is liberated. And the “you” that remains— the you that, in that first discourse on the not-self, the Buddha depicts as liberated— is this liberated consciousness. I
As we saw in chapter 2, feelings are designed by natural selection to represent judgments about things, evaluations of them; natural selection “wants” you to experience things as either good or bad. The Buddha believed that the less you judge things— including the contents of your mind— the more clearly you’ll see them, and the less deluded you’ll be.
Still, amid all the disagreement over what the Buddha said and what the Buddha meant, there are some themes that everyone agrees are part of the Buddhist tradition from early on. And one of these is that our conception of our selves is, at best, wildly off the mark. We associate the self with control and with firm persistence through time, but on close inspection we turn out to be much less under control, and much more fluid, with a much less fixed identity, than we think.

6. Your CEO Is MIA

This chapter explores the concept of the not-self through Buddha's discourse, modern psychology's view on the illusion of self-control, and evolutionary psychology's modular mind theory. It highlights how self-delusion and memory biases align with evolutionary advantages, questioning the conscious self's role as a central decision-maker.

The Buddha's Discourse on Not-Self

Modern Psychological Insights

Questions about how in control the conscious mind really is have now been raised from a lot of experimental angles. In a famous series of experiments first done in the early 1980s by Benjamin Libet, researchers monitored the brains of subjects while they “chose” to initiate an action. The researchers concluded that the brain was initiating the action before the person became aware of “deciding” to initiate it.
If the conscious self isn’t a CEO, directing all the behavior it thinks it’s directing, how does behavior get directed? How do decisions get made? An increasingly common answer within the field of psychology, especially evolutionary psychology, is that the mind is “modular.” In this view, your mind is composed of lots of specialized modules— modules for sizing up situations and reacting to them— and it’s the interplay among these modules that shapes your behavior. And much of this interplay happens without conscious awareness on your part.

Self-Delusion and Natural Selection

In short, from natural selection’s point of view, it’s good for you to tell a coherent story about yourself, to depict yourself as a rational, self-aware actor. So whenever your actual motivations aren’t accessible to the part of your brain that communicates with the world, it would make sense for that part of your brain to generate stories about your motivation.
Our egocentric biases are aided and abetted by the way memory works. Though certain painful events get seared into our memories— perhaps so we can avoid repeating the mistakes that led to them— we are on balance more likely to remember events that reflect favorably on us than those that don’t. And we remember positive experiences in greater detail than negative experiences, as if the positive events are specially primed for sharing with the public in rich detail. No such asymmetry of narrative detail is found in our memory of positive and negative things that happen to other people.
What’s more, when we recount an experience to someone, the act of recounting it changes the memory of it. So if we reshape the story a bit each time— omitting inconvenient facts, exaggerating convenient ones— we can, over time, transform our actual belief about what happened. Which presumably makes it easier to convince others that our story is true.

The Modular Mind

So if the conscious mind isn’t in control, what is in control? As we’ll see, the answer may be: nothing in particular. The closer we look at the mind, the more it seems to consist of a lot of different players, players that sometimes collaborate but sometimes fight for control, with victory going to the one that is in some sense the strongest. In other words, it’s a jungle in there, and you’re not the king of the jungle. The good news is that, paradoxically, realizing you’re not king can be the first step toward getting some real power.
The capacity for feeling, and for subjective experience in general, is what gives life meaning and what gives valence to moral questions. If you imagine a planet full of humanlike robots, incapable of subjective experience, would there be anything obviously wrong about destroying them, or anything obviously good about creating more of them?

All Highlights

So if the conscious mind isn’t in control, what is in control? As we’ll see, the answer may be: nothing in particular. The closer we look at the mind, the more it seems to consist of a lot of different players, players that sometimes collaborate but sometimes fight for control, with victory going to the one that is in some sense the strongest. In other words, it’s a jungle in there, and you’re not the king of the jungle. The good news is that, paradoxically, realizing you’re not king can be the first step toward getting some real power.
Questions about how in control the conscious mind really is have now been raised from a lot of experimental angles. In a famous series of experiments first done in the early 1980s by Benjamin Libet, researchers monitored the brains of subjects while they “chose” to initiate an action. The researchers concluded that the brain was initiating the action before the person became aware of “deciding” to initiate it.
So if you’re a Buddhist philosopher, you may feel vindicated. But you may also feel puzzled. Why would natural selection design a brain that leaves people deluded about themselves? One answer is that if we believe something about ourselves, that will help us convince other people to believe it. And certainly it’s to our benefit— or, more precisely, it would have been to the benefit of the genes of our hunter-gatherer ancestors— to convince the world that we’re coherent, consistent actors who have things under control.
In short, from natural selection’s point of view, it’s good for you to tell a coherent story about yourself, to depict yourself as a rational, self-aware actor. So whenever your actual motivations aren’t accessible to the part of your brain that communicates with the world, it would make sense for that part of your brain to generate stories about your motivation.
Our egocentric biases are aided and abetted by the way memory works. Though certain painful events get seared into our memories— perhaps so we can avoid repeating the mistakes that led to them— we are on balance more likely to remember events that reflect favorably on us than those that don’t. And we remember positive experiences in greater detail than negative experiences, as if the positive events are specially primed for sharing with the public in rich detail. No such asymmetry of narrative detail is found in our memory of positive and negative things that happen to other people.
What’s more, when we recount an experience to someone, the act of recounting it changes the memory of it. So if we reshape the story a bit each time— omitting inconvenient facts, exaggerating convenient ones— we can, over time, transform our actual belief about what happened. Which presumably makes it easier to convince others that our story is true.
If the conscious self isn’t a CEO, directing all the behavior it thinks it’s directing, how does behavior get directed? How do decisions get made? An increasingly common answer within the field of psychology, especially evolutionary psychology, is that the mind is “modular.” In this view, your mind is composed of lots of specialized modules— modules for sizing up situations and reacting to them— and it’s the interplay among these modules that shapes your behavior. And much of this interplay happens without conscious awareness on your part.
The capacity for feeling, and for subjective experience in general, is what gives life meaning and what gives valence to moral questions. If you imagine a planet full of humanlike robots, incapable of subjective experience, would there be anything obviously wrong about destroying them, or anything obviously good about creating more of them?

7. The Mental Modules That Run Your Life

This chapter explores the interplay between Buddhism and modern psychology, focusing on the impermanence of psychological states and the role of mental modules. It delves into experiments showing how external stimuli influence behavior, supporting the Buddhist view of a non-enduring self. Emotions are key in activating different mental modules, challenging the notion of a unified self. Mindfulness meditation is suggested as a practice to manage and gain clarity over these fleeting states.

Intertemporal Utility Function and Discounting

Buddhist Concept of Not-Self

Psychological Experiments and Module Activation

Impact of Emotions and Modules

Implications for the Concept of Self

Role of Mindfulness Meditation

All Highlights

It may seem that such illusions aren’t worth getting up in arms about. What’s wrong with men and women indulging in self-delusion in the course of trying to impress each other? Nothing, I guess. Some illusions are harmless, and some are even beneficial. Far be it from me to try to talk you out of all your illusions. By and large, my philosophy is Live and let live: if you’re enjoying the Matrix, go crazy.

8. How Thoughts Think Themselves

This chapter explores how different Buddhist meditative practices provide insights into the workings of the human mind, particularly through the lens of the modular model. It explains how mindfulness meditation can reveal the modular nature of the mind and the role of feelings in propelling thoughts. The chapter also draws connections to Buddhist teachings and modern psychology’s understanding of the cognitive-affective relationship.

Different Buddhist Traditions

Mindfulness as a Study Tool

The Modular Model of the Mind

Meditative Progress and Thought Observation

The Role of Feelings in Thought

“Curiosity is a gift, a capacity of pleasure in knowing.”
Whether curiosity is more like a desperate hunger or a delightful lure seems to depend on how directly and urgently relevant it is to our interests as defined by natural selection; the less direct and urgent the connection, the more subtle and pleasant the feeling.
“Every thought has a propellant, and that propellant is emotional.”

Buddhism and Cognitive-Affective Entanglement

In a famous sutra called The Greater Discourse on the Destruction of Craving, the Buddha says that a “mind object”— a category that includes thoughts— is just like a taste or a smell: whether a person is “tasting a flavor with the tongue” or “smelling an odor with the nose” or “cognizing a mind object with the mind,” the person “lusts after it if it is pleasing” and “dislikes it if it is unpleasing.”

All Highlights

“Curiosity is a gift, a capacity of pleasure in knowing.”
Whether curiosity is more like a desperate hunger or a delightful lure seems to depend on how directly and urgently relevant it is to our interests as defined by natural selection; the less direct and urgent the connection, the more subtle and pleasant the feeling.
“Every thought has a propellant, and that propellant is emotional.”
In a famous sutra called The Greater Discourse on the Destruction of Craving, the Buddha says that a “mind object”— a category that includes thoughts— is just like a taste or a smell: whether a person is “tasting a flavor with the tongue” or “smelling an odor with the nose” or “cognizing a mind object with the mind,” the person “lusts after it if it is pleasing” and “dislikes it if it is unpleasing.”

9. “Self” Control

The chapter explores David Hume's concept that emotions drive human reason, supported by modern neuroscience showing brain regions tied to emotions influence decisions. It highlights the evolutionary role of feelings and presents mindfulness meditation as a strategy for managing impulses and self-control issues.

Self and Emotion

Scientific Insights

Evolutionary Perspective

Self-Control and Reason

“Reason alone,” Hume argued, “can never oppose passion in the direction of the will.” Nothing “can oppose or retard the impulse of passion but a contrary impulse.”

Modular Mind Concept

Mindfulness Meditation

Addiction and Habits

All Highlights

Brain-scan studies have shown that the same parts of the brain that mediate physical pain also mediate the pain of social rejection. Which helps explain why opiates and other painkillers can take the sting out of social setbacks. Even extended doses of Tylenol, one study showed, can dull the pain of social rejection.
“Reason alone,” Hume argued, “can never oppose passion in the direction of the will.” Nothing “can oppose or retard the impulse of passion but a contrary impulse.”

10. Encounters with the Formless

In this chapter, the author explores the Buddhist concepts of formlessness and emptiness, arguing that perceived reality is constructed by the mind and lacks intrinsic essence. Through meditation, it's possible to perceive raw sensory experiences without imposed narratives. Modern psychology supports this view by showing how perception is an active process. The chapter also discusses the moral significance embedded in Buddhist teachings and the importance of direct contemplative practice for achieving liberation.

Illusory Nature of Reality

The Psychological Perspective

Meditative Practice and Perception

The Doctrine of Emptiness

Moral and Narrative Meaning

Deeply embedded in Buddhist thought is the intrinsic moral value of sentient life— not just the value of human beings but the value of all organisms that have subjective experience and so are capable of pain and pleasure, of suffering and not suffering. And this value in turn imparts value to other things, such as helping people, being kind to dogs, and so on. Moral meaning is, in that sense, inherent in life.

Teacher’s Perspective

Her job is to teach liberation, and at that moment she was my teacher. Besides, she seemed to think that nothing does more good for the world than a truly liberated being— not even an unliberated author who steers others in the general direction of liberation.

All Highlights

Her job is to teach liberation, and at that moment she was my teacher. Besides, she seemed to think that nothing does more good for the world than a truly liberated being— not even an unliberated author who steers others in the general direction of liberation.
Deeply embedded in Buddhist thought is the intrinsic moral value of sentient life— not just the value of human beings but the value of all organisms that have subjective experience and so are capable of pain and pleasure, of suffering and not suffering. And this value in turn imparts value to other things, such as helping people, being kind to dogs, and so on. Moral meaning is, in that sense, inherent in life.

11. The Upside of Emptiness

This chapter explores the relationship between emotional response, perception, and the Buddhist concept of emptiness. It discusses Capgras delusion as an example of disrupted emotional recognition and equates emotional responses with perceptions of 'essence.' Meditation can diminish these emotional reactions, making the world appear 'empty' but still detailed. The role of stories in shaping our sensory experiences is also examined, showing how cognitive expectations can alter actual perception.

Capgras Delusion and Emptiness

Affective Response and Perception

Essence and Affect

Meditation and Perception of Emptiness

He answered, “But it’s a much cleaner perception. If I’m tasting a glass of wine and I’m trying to impress some restaurant critics or some friend who’s a great wine fancier, then I may have a story going, I may have an expectation for how this wine should be and how I should expect it to taste, and so it really blocks my clear, simple perception.  .  .  . So by getting this thought out of the way, this emotional thought out of the way, I have a much higher likelihood of directly perceiving whatever the sensation is.”

Stories and Perception

Maybe the reason babies get so immersed in shapes and textures is because they haven’t yet developed their filing system, their sense of essence. In other words, they don’t yet “know” what the “things” surrounding them are, so the world is a wonderland of exploration. And maybe this helps explain how Weber could say that “emptiness” is actually “full”: sometimes not seeing essence lets you get drawn into the richness of things.

All Highlights

He answered, “But it’s a much cleaner perception. If I’m tasting a glass of wine and I’m trying to impress some restaurant critics or some friend who’s a great wine fancier, then I may have a story going, I may have an expectation for how this wine should be and how I should expect it to taste, and so it really blocks my clear, simple perception.  .  .  . So by getting this thought out of the way, this emotional thought out of the way, I have a much higher likelihood of directly perceiving whatever the sensation is.”
Maybe the reason babies get so immersed in shapes and textures is because they haven’t yet developed their filing system, their sense of essence. In other words, they don’t yet “know” what the “things” surrounding them are, so the world is a wonderland of exploration. And maybe this helps explain how Weber could say that “emptiness” is actually “full”: sometimes not seeing essence lets you get drawn into the richness of things.

12. A Weedless World

This chapter explores the Buddhist concept of emptiness and scientific ideas around essence, perception, and biases. Through meditation experiences, the author illustrates how perceived essences of people and objects are constructed and can alter dramatically, impacting judgments and moral views. Psychological mechanisms that maintain these essences also influence social interactions and conflicts. Meditation helps to breakdown these preconceived notions, promoting empathy and a clearer understanding of others.

Essence and Perception

Judgment and Biases

Essence-Preservation Mechanisms

Expediency vs. Understanding


13. Like, Wow, Everything Is One (at Most)

This chapter explores Buddhist concepts of not-self and emptiness, underscored by personal anecdotes and philosophical discussions. It contrasts these ideas with Hinduism's notion of a universal soul and incorporates scientific perspectives on self and interdependence. The chapter also delves into the 'three poisons' in Buddhism, linking them to the sensation of self and the path to enlightenment.

Meditative Experience and Not-Self

Buddhism vs. Hindu Philosophy

There is a sense of dissolution of the bounds of self and an ensuing sense of continuity with the world out there. If you’re Buddhist (at least, a Buddhist of the mainstream type), you’re encouraged to think of that as a continuity of emptiness; and if you’re a Hindu, you’re encouraged to think of it as a continuity of soul or spirit.

Scientific Perspective on Self

“Between what a man calls me and what he simply calls mine the line is difficult to draw.” In that sense, he observed, “our immediate family is

Three Poisons in Buddhism

The refrain warns people to avoid the “three poisons” of raga, dvesha, and moha. Those three words are typically translated as “greed, hatred, and delusion,”

All Highlights

“Between what a man calls me and what he simply calls mine the line is difficult to draw.” In that sense, he observed, “our immediate family is
There is a sense of dissolution of the bounds of self and an ensuing sense of continuity with the world out there. If you’re Buddhist (at least, a Buddhist of the mainstream type), you’re encouraged to think of that as a continuity of emptiness; and if you’re a Hindu, you’re encouraged to think of it as a continuity of soul or spirit.
The refrain warns people to avoid the “three poisons” of raga, dvesha, and moha. Those three words are typically translated as “greed, hatred, and delusion,”

14. Nirvana in a Nutshell

The chapter discusses the distinction between nirvana and bliss, illustrating nirvana's deeper and more enduring nature. It emphasizes mindfulness meditation's role in achieving liberation by understanding and observing feelings without craving. The 'not-self' concept is explained through the interaction of self with external causes, and the chapter ends with a highlight of the interaction between Buddhist thought and scientific insights.

Nirvana versus Bliss

Nirvana's Dual Nature

The Unconditioned and Conditioned

Mindfulness Meditation

“It is here in this space between feeling and craving that the battle will be fought which will determine whether bondage will continue indefinitely into the future or whether it will be replaced by enlightenment and liberation. For if instead of yielding to craving, to the driving thirst for pleasure, if a person contemplates with mindfulness and awareness the nature of feelings and understands these feelings as they are, then that person can prevent craving from crystallizing and solidifying.”
This has been the point of much of this book. The human brain is a machine designed by natural selection to respond in pretty reflexive fashion to the sensory input impinging on it. It is designed, in a certain sense, to be controlled by that input. And a key cog in the machinery of control is the feelings that arise in response to the input. If you interact with those feelings via tanha— via the natural, reflexive thirst for the pleasant feelings and the natural, reflexive aversion to the unpleasant feelings— you will continue to be controlled by the world around you. But if you observe those feelings mindfully rather than just reacting to them, you can in some measure escape the control; the causes that ordinarily shape your behavior can be defied, and you can get closer to the unconditioned.
conditions— from chains of causation that otherwise shackle you. The things in your environment— the sights, the sounds, the smells, the people, the news, the videos— are pushing your buttons, activating feelings that, however subtly, set in motion trains of thought and reaction that govern your behavior, sometimes in ways that are unfortunate. And they will keep doing that unless you start paying attention to what’s going on.

Not-Self Concept

Consider the idea of not-self: what we call the “self” is in such constant causal interaction with its environment, is so pervasively influenced by the world out there, as to raise doubts about how firm the boundaries of the self— and, for that matter, the core of the self— really are. Remember how the Buddha emphasized, in that original not-self sermon, that the various things we think of as parts of our self are in fact not under our control? The reason they’re not under our control is that— until we’re liberated, at least— they’re under the control of outside forces: they’re conditioned. And remember the Buddha’s emphasis on the impermanence of the things we think of as parts of the self? This too— the perennial arising and passing away of thoughts, emotions, attitudes— is a consequence of the ever-changing forces that act on us, forces that set off chain reactions inside us. The things inside us are subject to causes, to conditions— and it is the fate of all conditioned things to change when conditions change. And conditions change pretty much all the time.

Scientific and Buddhist Interactions

All Highlights

“It is here in this space between feeling and craving that the battle will be fought which will determine whether bondage will continue indefinitely into the future or whether it will be replaced by enlightenment and liberation. For if instead of yielding to craving, to the driving thirst for pleasure, if a person contemplates with mindfulness and awareness the nature of feelings and understands these feelings as they are, then that person can prevent craving from crystallizing and solidifying.”
conditions— from chains of causation that otherwise shackle you. The things in your environment— the sights, the sounds, the smells, the people, the news, the videos— are pushing your buttons, activating feelings that, however subtly, set in motion trains of thought and reaction that govern your behavior, sometimes in ways that are unfortunate. And they will keep doing that unless you start paying attention to what’s going on.
This has been the point of much of this book. The human brain is a machine designed by natural selection to respond in pretty reflexive fashion to the sensory input impinging on it. It is designed, in a certain sense, to be controlled by that input. And a key cog in the machinery of control is the feelings that arise in response to the input. If you interact with those feelings via tanha— via the natural, reflexive thirst for the pleasant feelings and the natural, reflexive aversion to the unpleasant feelings— you will continue to be controlled by the world around you. But if you observe those feelings mindfully rather than just reacting to them, you can in some measure escape the control; the causes that ordinarily shape your behavior can be defied, and you can get closer to the unconditioned.
Consider the idea of not-self: what we call the “self” is in such constant causal interaction with its environment, is so pervasively influenced by the world out there, as to raise doubts about how firm the boundaries of the self— and, for that matter, the core of the self— really are. Remember how the Buddha emphasized, in that original not-self sermon, that the various things we think of as parts of our self are in fact not under our control? The reason they’re not under our control is that— until we’re liberated, at least— they’re under the control of outside forces: they’re conditioned. And remember the Buddha’s emphasis on the impermanence of the things we think of as parts of the self? This too— the perennial arising and passing away of thoughts, emotions, attitudes— is a consequence of the ever-changing forces that act on us, forces that set off chain reactions inside us. The things inside us are subject to causes, to conditions— and it is the fate of all conditioned things to change when conditions change. And conditions change pretty much all the time.

15. Is Enlightenment Enlightening?

This chapter explores the linkage between enlightenment and liberation in Buddhism, contrasting it with The Matrix's more tangible struggle. It discusses how natural selection imposes self-serving delusions, and achieving enlightenment involves rejecting these values through experiential understanding. Enlightenment encompasses seeing the truths of not-self and emptiness, fostering moral objectivity and universal concern. The chapter emphasizes mindfulness meditation as a tool for transcending evolutionary biases and achieving a more truthful, interconnected view of reality.

Enlightenment and Liberation

Differences Between The Matrix and Buddhism

Natural Selection as the Oppressor

Well, from natural selection’s point of view, this is heresy. If there’s one idea that natural selection has built into me, it’s that I have distinctive interests and should focus on them. On those occasions when some of my interests overlap with the interests of others, then fine, we can do business; but if there’s no such overlap, my interests take priority.

The Enlightenment Checklist

Rebellion Against Natural Selection

Well, from natural selection’s point of view, this is heresy. If there’s one idea that natural selection has built into me, it’s that I have distinctive interests and should focus on them. On those occasions when some of my interests overlap with the interests of others, then fine, we can do business; but if there’s no such overlap, my interests take priority.

Emptiness as Truth

Einstein and Enlightenment

Moral Objectivity and Universal Concern

The Cosmic Context

Mindfulness as a Tool

All Highlights

Well, from natural selection’s point of view, this is heresy. If there’s one idea that natural selection has built into me, it’s that I have distinctive interests and should focus on them. On those occasions when some of my interests overlap with the interests of others, then fine, we can do business; but if there’s no such overlap, my interests take priority.

16. Meditation and the Unseen Order

In this chapter, the author reflects on their first meditation retreat, revealing transformative experiences and insights into the nature of self-criticism. Meditation is presented as a continuous process of enlightenment, offering both personal and global benefits. The concept of dharma and the idea of seeing meditative practice as aligning metaphysical and moral truths are emphasized.

Experiencing Transformation

Meditation and Self-Understanding

Continued Meditation Practice

The Incremental Path to Enlightenment

“Monks, true knowledge is the forerunner in the entry upon wholesome states, with a sense of shame and fear of wrongdoing following along.”

Global Implications

Meditation as a Secular Practice

The Concept of Dharma

evidence in favor of it. This three-part alignment— the alignment of metaphysical truth and moral truth and happiness— is embodied in the richly ambiguous word that lies at the heart of Buddhist practice: dharma.

All Highlights

“Monks, true knowledge is the forerunner in the entry upon wholesome states, with a sense of shame and fear of wrongdoing following along.”
evidence in favor of it. This three-part alignment— the alignment of metaphysical truth and moral truth and happiness— is embodied in the richly ambiguous word that lies at the heart of Buddhist practice: dharma.

Appendix A List of Buddhist Truths

This chapter outlines core Buddhist ideas and defends their validity using insights from modern science, particularly evolutionary psychology and neuroscience. Major themes include human suffering, the concept of self, the illusion of essences, and the transformative potential of meditative practices. The chapter emphasizes the alignment between Buddhist thought and scientific understanding of human nature.

Introduction to Buddhist Truths

Scientific Validity

Human Perception and Suffering

Dukkha and Natural Selection

Tanha

Overcoming Tanha

Concept of Self

Interior vs. Exterior Not-Self

Moral Implications

Essences and Emptiness

Importance of Clear Perception

Awareness of Conditioning

Conclusion


A Note on Terminology

The chapter discusses the author's choices in using Sanskrit and Pali terminology for Buddhist concepts, balancing the context of Theravada and Mahayana traditions. It explains the preference for terms like discourse over sutra and the use of enlightenment over awakening to align the book's themes with rational analysis and Western scientific philosophy.

Language Choices

Decisions on Terminology

Enlightenment vs. Awakening


Acknowledgments

This chapter acknowledges the numerous contributions from educational institutions, colleagues, students, and family that influenced the development of the book. It underscores the Buddhist concept of interdependence, reflecting on how various influences shape one's work.

Interdependent Universe

Support from Educational Institutions

Acknowledgment of Contributors

Silent Meditation Retreats

Support from Publisher

Personal Support